K.C.G. v. State, No. 20S-JV-263, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 16, 2020).

Juvenile Court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction when it adjudicated juvenile as a delinquent child for dangerously possessing a firearm, an act that would not be an offense if committed by an adult.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Harris v. State, No. 20A-CR-732, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 17, 2020).

Trial court acted within its discretion when it accepted a guilty plea but explained it would not be accepted until review of the PSI; then after review of the PSI determined the plea agreement was unacceptable and allowed the defendant to revoke the guilty plea before trial.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Jackson v. State, No. 20A-CR-385, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 19, 2020).

When a defendant failed to remove his hands from his pockets and sit down, there was insufficient evidence of physical efforts by the defendant to resist law enforcement and therefore the “forcibly” element of the offense of resisting law enforcement could not be satisfied.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Williams v. State, 20A-CR-1209, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 12, 2020).

Indiana’s theft statute does not criminalize the taking of lost or mislaid property.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

R.W. v. J.W., No. 19A-PO-2697, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 13, 2020).

The existence of an emergency order of protection issued in Illinois in favor of one party did not require the trial court to transfer the other party’s Indiana petition for protective order to Illinois under Ind. Code § 34-26-5-6(4).

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion