Moell v. Moell, No. 45A05-1704-DR-784, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 13, 2017).

Trial court did not have authority to allow the 17-year-old child of the parties to make his own decisions regarding parenting time and related issues.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Harris v. Lafayette HIHTC, LP, No. 79A02-1703-SC-638, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 13, 2017).

Trial court violated defendant’s due process right to an impartial decision maker by making improper comments about paying rent.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Vickery v. Ardagh Glass, Inc., No. 49A02-1702-PL-330, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 13, 2017).

Litigating in a Commercial Court is not compulsory. Defendant waived challenge to Commercial Court’s personal jurisdiction by failing to file a refusal notice. Cautions attorneys and trial courts to be mindful of the notice requirements for temporary restraining orders.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Cardinal Health Ventures, Inc. v. Scanameo, No. 18A02-1703-CT-487, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 4, 2017).

Parties are entitled to a jury trial for securities fraud.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

In re D.F., No. 82A04-1704-JC-869, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 27, 2017).

The Court of Appeals issued a reminder that trial court magistrates do not have the authority to enter final judgments in civil cases, including juvenile cases.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion