Broude v. State, No. 75A03-1101-CR-37, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 24, 2011).

When trial began and child molestation victim could not testify in court, two week continuance to provide for closed-circuit television testimony was not erroneous.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Hill v. State, No. 48A02-1103-CR-179, __ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 25, 2011).

Officer’s general concern about suspects having weapons and his dislike of suspects placing hands in their pockets did not support stop and frisk.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Allen v. State, No. 15A04-1101-CR-16, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 25, 2011).

Visiting a common nuisance and dealing in heroin should have been charged together, and accordingly the heroin dealing charge was barred by the Successive Prosecution Statute.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Garrett v. State, No. 49A02-1101-CR-1, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 26, 2011).

Defendant did not have a right to resist law enforcement officer’s placing her in handcuffs when officer was responding to a domestic violence report.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Jennings v. State, No. 53A01-1010-CR-541, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., October 27, 2011).

B misdemeanor sentence of 30 executed, 150 suspended, and 365 probation exceeded the statutory one year maximum combined imprisonment and probation limit.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion