Dixon v. State, No. 84A01-1307-CR-339, __ N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App., July 22, 2014).

Terry pat-down search could not be conducted under the facts of the case.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Montgomery v. State, No. 82A05-1401-CR-34, __ n.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 23, 2014).

As statute requires a sex offender who moves to report to both the county he is leaving and the county he is moving to, defendant’s convictions for failing to register as a sex or violent offender in both counties were not barred either by statute or double jeopardy principles.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Fischer v. Heymann, No. 49S02-1309-PL-620, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 17, 2014).

Responding to the plaintiff’s demand was not the defendant’s only option to mitigate damages, but the trial court was within its discretion to reduce damages.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Camoplast Crocker, LLC v. Magic Circle Corp., No. 29S02-1407-CT-476, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 21, 2014).

Plaintiff’s amendment of the complaint was proper when it was filed before the two-year limitation period expired, even though the court granted the motion to amend after the limitation period expired.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Willis v. State, No. 49A02-1310-CR-854, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 11, 2014).

Affirms criminal trespass conviction based on evidence defendant was seen running near the scene of the alleged crime not long after a security alarm was activated and voices and noises were heard inside the premises.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion