H.H. v. S. H., No. 20A-PO-926, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 13, 2020).

Ind. Code § 34-26-5-9(f) does not require that the trial court make a particularized finding to support a deviation from the stated two-year term when issuing a protective order.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Brown v. Southside Animal Shelter, Inc., No. 20A-CT-66, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 13, 2020).

Animal shelter had a duty to inform prospective adopters of a dog’s vicious characteristics so far as they were known or ascertainable by exercise of reasonable care.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Crouse v. State, 19A-CR-3008, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 8, 2020).

A waiver of appeal set forth as part of a plea agreement applies only to sentences imposed in accordance with the law.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Hill v. State, 19A-CR-2083, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 2, 2020).

Multiple reckless homicide convictions, based on multiple victims, do not violate double jeopardy.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Diaz v. State, 20A-CR-203, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 2, 2020).

Convictions for murder and robbery, which relate to a single victim, do not offend double jeopardy.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion