Wilson v. State, No. 79A05-1107-CR-350, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May, 9, 2012).

By fleeing from his automobile at the approach of the police the driver abandoned the vehicle for purposes of the Fourth Amendment, so that he could not object to a search of the vehicle.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Yanez v. State, No. 49A02-1104-CR-362, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 21, 2012).

When officer who made the investigatory stop did not testify as to her reasons for making the stop and supporting officer’s testimony amounted only to “postulation” as for reasons for the initial stop, there was no showing that there was any constitutional basis for stopping the defendant.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

McWhorter v. State, No. 33A05-1010-PC-685, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 23, 2011)

When defendant admitted he broke into a home without permission, his statement that he was confused about where he was at the time did not amount to an avowal of innocence preventing a guilty plea.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

In the Matter of the Commitment of A.L., No. 49A02-1001-MH-76, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 23, 2010)

Even though petition for emergency detention alleged only severe disability as a basis, trial court could properly rely in its decision on dangerousness as well.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Giddings v. State, No. 40A01-0909-PC-455, __ N.E.2D __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 25, 2010)

U.S. Supreme Court’s verdict unanimity requirement for individual components of a continuing criminal enterprise under federal criminal law is not applicable to Indiana child molesting cases.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion