Sowers v. State, No. 08A02-1208-CR-640, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 16, 2013)

In this case, improper communication between bailiff and foreperson was fundamental error.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Guzman v. State, No. 54A01-1209-CR-409, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 15, 2013).

When defendant pled guilty to reckless homicide based on death of the driver of the vehicle defendant crashed into, the deceased driver’s passenger was a “victim” for whom trial court properly ordered restitution payment of medical expenses.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Reid v. State, No. 89A01-1208-PC-377, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 8, 2013).

There is no Due Process right to access lost or destroyed evidence, here DNA evidence, during post-conviction proceedings.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

South Shore Baseball, LLC v. DeJesus, No. 45A03-1205-CT-222,___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 15, 2013).

After being hit by a foul ball at a professional baseball game, plaintiff could not prevail under premises liability or negligence.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Sanjari v. State, No. 20A03-1206-CR-273, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 15, 2013).

When a trial court resentences multiple counts on remand, no presumption of vindictive sentencing arises if the aggregate resentence is not greater than the original aggregate sentence.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion