Guilmette v. State, No. 71A04-1205-CR-250, __ N.E.2 __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 22, 2013).

When authorities have taken an inmate’s clothing for inventory and safekeeping while he awaits trial, the Indiana Constitution requires that they must obtain a warrant to test the clothing regarding an unrelated, uncharged crime.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Stutz v. State, No. 49A02-1110-CR-960, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 5, 2012).

“[C]lass A misdemeanor operating a vehicle with a BAC of at least .15 percent is not a lesser included offense of class C misdemeanor operating while intoxicated.”

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Walters v. Austin, No. 20A04-1106-CT-342,___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., April 18, 2012).

The amended motion to correct error was a repetitive motion and so the filing of the amended motion did not change the date for filing the notice of appeal.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Vankirk v. State, No. 29A02-1012-CR-1418, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 5, 2011).

Modification of D felony operating while habitual traffic violator to A misdemeanor changes also provides that defendant’s driving privileges are suspended, not forfeited.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Robinson v. State, No. 49A02-1101-CR-13, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 5, 2011).

Probable cause affidavit with “multiple levels of hearsay” did not pass the “substantial trustworthiness” test required by a probation revocation subject’s confrontation right.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion