Singh v. Singh, No. 20A-CT-959, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 8, 2020).

Temple had a duty to protect its attendees when it had notice of present and specific circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to recognize the risk of an imminent criminal act, and had reason to recognize the probability or likelihood of looming harm on a special day of celebration.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Blackford v. Welborn Clinic, No. 19A-CT-2054, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 26, 2020).

A nonclaim statute may be tolled in cases of fraudulent concealment.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Cook v. State, No. 19A-CR-2225, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 31, 2020).

Statements to a witness in a pending action to “bow out” to not “lose anything in the end” is sufficient to sustain a conviction for attempted obstruction of justice.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Buford v. State, No. 19A-CR-956, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 20, 2019).

Criminal contempt for violation of a no contact order and ninety-day jail sentence was vacated on double jeopardy grounds because the State filed an invasion of privacy charge on the same day as the contempt hearing.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

In re Termination of Parent-Child Relationship, S.K., No. 19A-JT-1797, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 23, 2019).

The Indian Child Welfare Act did not apply to child because the child did not belong to a federally recognized tribe.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion