Stewart v. McCray, No. 19A-PL-149, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 11, 2019).

Trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction in a dispute over church’s leadership.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Hotep-El v. State, No. 18A-CR-477, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 13, 2018).

The trial court properly terminated self-representation of a sovereign citizen based on its conclusion that he sought to use the courtroom for deliberate disruption of the proceedings.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

C.S. v. State, No. 18A-JV-862, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 19, 2018).

Ind. Code § 31-37-18-1.3 requires that a delinquent child be given notice of and an opportunity to be heard during a dispositional or modification hearing; however, the child is not required to be physically present and participation via video conferencing is enough.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Pflugh v. Indianapolis Historic Preservation Comm’n, No. 18A-PL-351, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 1, 2018).

Neighbor lacks standing to challenge a rezoning decision unless he can show pecuniary or special injury.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

McCallister v. McCallister, No. 49D12-1606-DR-19232, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 26, 2018).

Although under federal law the court could not order husband to change the beneficiary on his Air Force Survivor Benefit Plan as required by the Marital Settlement Agreement, the trial court can determine the value of the Survivor Benefit Plan and reconsider the distribution of marital assets as an alternative remedy.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion