H.H. v. S. H., No. 20A-PO-926, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 13, 2020).

Ind. Code § 34-26-5-9(f) does not require that the trial court make a particularized finding to support a deviation from the stated two-year term when issuing a protective order.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Reece v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc., No. 20A-CT-214, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 20, 2020).

Defendant was not negligent when its grass grew so high that the grass blocked the view at the intersection because the “dangerous condition” was confined to defendant’s property.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Berg v. Berg, No. 19A-DC-3038, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 15, 2020).

Trial court improperly granted a T.R. 60(B) motion alleging that an account was omitted from a balance sheet used at mediation because it relied on inadmissible evidence from mediation.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Hallie, No. 19A-MF-2183, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 9, 2020).

Bank can elicit foundational testimony for a business record from a witness even if the witness was not present at the time a document was created, if the witness has a functional understanding of the record keeping process of the business with respect to the specific entry, transaction, or declaration contained in the document

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Allen v. State, No. 19A-XP-1013, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 19, 2020).

Expungement prohibition for those convicted of a felony that resulted in serious bodily injury to another person only applies if serious bodily injury is an element of the offense.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion