Gerber v. State, No. 02A03-0902-CR-73, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 28, 2009)

Gerber v. State (Ind. Ct. App., May, J.) – Expungement statute does not require petitioner to wait until limitations period for dismissed charge has run, and trial judge erred in summarily dismissing expungement petition on that basis; on remand, prosecutor is not authorized to participate due to failure to have filed a notice of opposition.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Shivley v. State, No. 12A02-0903-CR-235, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 2, 2009)

In determining indigency for the purpose of court-appointed counsel, trial courts should consider defendant’s actual income as of the time of the hearings and his fixed monetary obligations, including his obligations to his family.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Harris v. State, No. 91A05-0904-CV-188, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App.. Sept. 2, 2009)

To constitute sufficient proof of notice under the bond forfeiture statute, State must at a minimum present evidence of compliance with Indiana Trial Rule 5(B), which governs service of papers in civil actions.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

In re Termination of Parental Relationship of J.G., No. 32A04-0902-JV-79, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 7, 2009)

Notwithstanding the recent revision of the relevant statutes, the General Assembly did not intend for DCS to bear the burden of court-appointed legal services in termination proceedings, and the county should continue to be responsible for those costs.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Webster v. State, No. 71A03-0902-CR-78, __ N.E.2D __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 22, 2009)

Search of traffic stop passenger’s purse, on basis officer thought it looked “stretched” and might therefore contain a firearm, violated Art. 1, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion