Bowman v. State, No. 21A04-1404-CR-180, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., May 26, 2015).

Without lab test, field test, or corroborating circumstantial evidence, testimony that the product of a controlled buy “looked like” heroin was insufficient to prove dealing in a narcotic drug within 1,000 feet of a school.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Carr v. State, No. 45A04-1409-CR-456, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 12, 2015).

Savings statute for the revised penal code prohibited application of the revised sentence modification statute, which does not require prosecutorial consent to a modification petition, to a petition to modify for a crime committed and sentenced prior to the July 1, 2014 effective date of the modification statute’s revision.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Tiplick v. State, No. 49A04-1312-CR-617, __ N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 27, 2015).

The dealing in a synthetic drug and possession of a synthetic drug offenses, as in effect in 2012, are unconstitutionally vague.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

J.P. v. Mid American Sound, No. 49A04-1405-CT-207, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 14, 2015).

The Indiana Tort Claims Act aggregate liability cap, as applied to the defendant, is constitutional.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Gertiser v. Stokes, No. 29A02-1401-DR-43, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 14, 2015).

It should have been considered a substantial and continuing change of circumstances when a woman receiving spousal maintenance now has substantial income and assets as a result of remarriage.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion