McKinley v. State, No. 49A02-1502-CR-78, ___ N.E.3d ___(Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 6, 2015).

Instructing the jury that defendant could be convicted under I.C. § 35-48-4-1(a)(2)(C) for “knowingly” possessing cocaine with intent to deliver was not fundamental error, although defining “intent to deliver” may have been preferable.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Reef v. Asset Acceptance, LLC, No. 49A05-1501-CC-3, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 11, 2015).

When a party failed to properly designate evidence in support of its motion for summary judgment, the trial court’s award of summary judgment was inappropriate.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Gross v. State, No. 41A01-1411-CR-467, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 14, 2015).

Due process required dismissal of charges against incompetent defendant, when he had been certified unlikely to be restored to competence and had been committed for longer than his maximum possible sentence less credit time.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Wertz v. State, No. 48A04-1409-CR-427, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 7, 2015).

“GPS device is similar in nature to a computer or cell phone, and that such a device cannot be treated as a ‘container’ that may be searched pursuant to the automobile exception to the warrant requirement.”

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

In re I.J., No. 57A03-1501-AD-28, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 8, 2015).

The trial court erred in denying a possible father’s (third-party) request for genetic testing for a child born to a married couple who placed the newborn for adoption.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion