Lee v. State, No. 49A04-1105-CR-225, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 17, 2012).

State’s evidence did not show officers had a reasonable belief sex offense suspect would destroy DNA evidence on his body, so that there were no exigent circumstances permitting the police to obtain DNA swabs from the suspect without first getting a search warrant.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Bunch v. State, No. 16A05-1007-PC-439, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 21, 2012).

Expert “fire victim toxicology analysis” testimony, developed as scientifically reliable after defendant’s arson felony murder trial, constituted newly discovered evidence and warranted a new trial.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Utility Center, Inc. v. City of Fort Wayne, No. 90A04-1101-PL-1, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 13, 2012).

“[J]udicial review of an administrative determination of just compensation should be limited to the consideration of whether there is substantial evidence to support the agency’s finding and order and whether the action constitutes an abuse of discretion, is arbitrary, capricious, or in excess of statutory authority as revealed by the uncontradicted facts.”

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Brent v. State, No. 34A04-1105-CR-268, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 17, 2011).

Marijuana found on street on passenger’s side of auto, where it may have been thrown from passenger’s window, coupled with driver’s suspicious behavior, was not sufficient to establish the passenger possessed the marijuana.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Yao v. State, No. 35A02-1006-CR-678, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 22, 2011).

Purchases by telephone from Texas business with shipping to Indiana address did not establish territorial jurisdiction for counterfeiting and theft charges.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion