Browning v. State, No. 49A05-1110-CR-540, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 17, 2012).

Evidence that defendant had child pornography images in a file-sharing program on his computer and that he knew others using the same file-sharing program could access and download the images in the program on his computer supported his conviction of child exploitation.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Orr v. State, No. 45A03-1107-CR-308, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 18, 2012).

Evidence Rule 613(b) confers discretion to allow a prior inconsistent statement to be admitted before the witness has a chance to explain or deny or, in some circumstances, even when witness is not given any chance to explain or deny.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Lee v. State, No. 49A04-1105-CR-225, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 17, 2012).

State’s evidence did not show officers had a reasonable belief sex offense suspect would destroy DNA evidence on his body, so that there were no exigent circumstances permitting the police to obtain DNA swabs from the suspect without first getting a search warrant.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Bunch v. State, No. 16A05-1007-PC-439, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 21, 2012).

Expert “fire victim toxicology analysis” testimony, developed as scientifically reliable after defendant’s arson felony murder trial, constituted newly discovered evidence and warranted a new trial.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Utility Center, Inc. v. City of Fort Wayne, No. 90A04-1101-PL-1, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 13, 2012).

“[J]udicial review of an administrative determination of just compensation should be limited to the consideration of whether there is substantial evidence to support the agency’s finding and order and whether the action constitutes an abuse of discretion, is arbitrary, capricious, or in excess of statutory authority as revealed by the uncontradicted facts.”

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion