Town of New Chicago v. City of Lake Station, No. 45A03-1001-PL-22, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 13, 2010)

As laches is an equitable defense, it was not available in this contract action, but the defense of equitable estoppel did apply.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

S.D. v. State, No. 49A02-1004-JV-442, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 29, 2010)

Juvenile waiver statute’s meaningful consultation requirement was not met when juvenile’s conversation with guardian was videotaped by police and juvenile and guardian knew it was being taped.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Cranston v. State, No. 29A02-1003-CR-374, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 8, 2010)

Datamaster evidence ticket is not “testimonial hearsay” under the Crawford Confrontation Clause holding.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Oberst v. State, No. 14A05-1003-PC-157, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 3, 2010)

Because the Sixth Amendment counsel right does not apply to a pre-charge police interview, defendant could not assert a claim that counsel gave him ineffective assistance during the interview.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Moore v. State, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 21, 2010)

A woman who was asleep in the passenger seat of her car, which her friend was driving, did not thereby commit the public intoxication offense.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion