Dillon v. State, No. 27A05-1210-CR-542, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 14, 2013).

When nunc pro tunc order reinstating OWI conviction after its “inadvertent[] dismissal” by State was entered after defendant had committed his second OWI offense, the reinstated conviction could not serve as a basis for enhancing the second to a D felony.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Dexter v. State, No. 79A04-1212-CR-611, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 22, 2013).

Certified transcript of guilty plea and sentencing hearing sufficed as proof of a prior unrelated conviction for habitual offender status.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Hickory Creek at Connersville v. Est. of Combs, No. 21A04-1211-ES-600, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 27, 2013).

“[A]ccording to the doctrine of necessaries, a creditor must first seek satisfaction from the income and property of the spouse who incurred the debt and only if those resources are insufficient may a creditor seek satisfaction from the non-contracting spouse.”

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

B.H. v. Ind. Dept. of Child Svcs., No. 52A02-1210-JT-849, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 30, 2013).

A properly qualified social worker can testify as an expert witness.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Steen v. State, No. 49A02-1211-CR-877, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 2, 2013).

Printing of store’s name “H & M” on security tags and store labels was not hearsay under Evidence Rule 801(c) because it was “not capable of being true or not true.”

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion