McCain v. State, No. 19A-CR-1113, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 6, 2020

While a trial judge is not prohibited from expressing personal disagreement with a jury’s verdict, a trial judge is prohibited from enhancing a defendant’s sentence based on that disagreement.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

In re Paternity of M.A.M., No. 19A-JP-771, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 11, 2019).

Prosecutor can pursue paternity proceedings at alleged father’s behest outside the two-year statute of limitations.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Hernandez-Velazquez v. Hernandez, No. 18A-DR-3109, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 14, 2019).

Trial court properly set aside property conveyances under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act to effectuate the division of marital assets during a divorce.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Battering v. State, No. 18A-CR-2309, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 11, 2019).

The defendant was not entitled to discharge under Criminal Rule 4(C) as trial-court proceedings were “stayed” when the trial court authorized an interlocutory appeal by the State and vacated the upcoming trial date, but did not actually use the word “stay.”

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Walmsley v. State, No. 18A-CR-2506, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 29, 2019).

A felony-murder charge of delivery of a narcotic drug resulting in death does not apply when two or more people jointly acquired and possessed the drug.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion