Defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal could not prevent his challenging on appeal the trial court’s erroneous imposition of consecutive habitual offender enhancements not agreed to in the bargain.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

“[T]he State is not . . . permitted to support [an] habitual offender finding with a conviction that arose out of the same res gestae that was the source of the conviction used to prove [defendant] was a serious violent felon.”

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Plaintiff forfeited his opportunity to conduct an evidentiary hearing challenging the constitutionality of the Medical Malpractice Act when he asked for the hearing 6 years into the case, post-verdict.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Appellate court may not find trial court abused its sentencing discretion based on weight trial court afforded aggravators and mitigators.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

A contract doesn’t need to state a specific dollar amount for goods or services in order to be enforceable.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion