Zartman v. Zartman, No. 18A-PL-1071, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 18, 2019).

June 24, 2019 | Volume 76 Issue 25 | Filed Under: Civil | Tagged: ,

When the content of a document is at issue in the context of a motion for summary judgment, it is for the court to decide based on the parties’ designated evidence.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Dunham v. State, No. 18A-IF-1442, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 15, 2019).

January 28, 2019 | Volume 76 Issue 4 | Filed Under: Criminal | Tagged: ,

Equipment that had just been used to perform farm drainage work and was being transported back to the office was exempt from the weight limit for heavy equipment on state highways.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Liddle v. Clark, No. 49A04-1707-MI-1662, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 23, 2018).

July 23, 2018 | Volume 75 Issue 27 | Filed Under: Civil | Tagged: ,

Damages for loss of a pet are limited to fair market value; sentimental value cannot be included in the calculation.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Dill v. State, No. 59A01-1610-CR-2449, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 22, 2017).

August 29, 2017 | Volume 74 Issue 35 | Filed Under: Criminal | Tagged: ,

Dealing in methamphetamine is not the same conduct as conspiracy to possess and distribute methamphetamine; State is not barred by Indiana’s double jeopardy statute from prosecution after defendant entered a guilty plea in federal court.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Johnson v. State, No. 32A05-1604-CR-703, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 19, 2017).

April 24, 2017 | Volume 74 Issue 17 | Filed Under: Criminal | Tagged: ,

Under legislation amended in 2015, if the offender was released more than ten years before the current offense the conviction does not count for habitual offender purposes.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion