Hevner v. State, No. 27S02-1001-CR-5, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Jan. 6, 2010)
Indiana Constitution’s ex post facto clause precludes application of a sex offender registration requirement enacted after the offense was committed.
Published by the Indiana Judicial Center
Indiana Constitution’s ex post facto clause precludes application of a sex offender registration requirement enacted after the offense was committed.
Juvenile court is not required to determine whether a child is a CHINS as to each parent, only whether the statutory CHINS elements have been established.
Indiana law recognizes a rebuttable presumption that children between the ages of seven and 14 are incapable of contributory negligence.
Conditioning the voluntary termination of parental rights on continuing post-adoption visitation irreconcilably conflicts with Indiana adoption law and is not permitted.
A constructive discharge claim may rest on involuntary resignation, but only where the cause fits within the grounds recognized by Indiana decisions on retaliatory discharge.
Jane Seigel, Executive Director
Michael J. McMahon, Director of Research
Amanda Wishin, Staff Attorney
30 South Meridian Street, Suite 900
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
Case Clips are selected decisions of the Indiana appellate courts abstracted for judges by the Indiana Judicial Center. The full text of Indiana opinions may be retrieved from the Indiana Judicial System website at courts.IN.gov/opinions.
The Judicial Center is the staff agency for the Judicial Conference of Indiana and serves Indiana judges and court personnel by providing educational programs, publications, and research assistance.
All content © 2013 Indiana Judicial Center courts.IN.gov