Belmares-Bautista v. State, No. 57A04-1003-CR-223, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 22, 2010)
When defendant made no claim that Spanish language documents he read erroneously translated a standard advisement of the right to counsel or that he did not understand the advice, he failed to show his waiver of counsel was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent.