Ryan v. State, No. 49A02-1211-CR-932, __ N.E.2 __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 31, 2013).

Prosecutor’s improper comments amounted to fundamental error.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Erkins v. State, No. 58A01-1205-CR-215, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. Ap., Apr. 23, 2013).

The State may obtain a conviction of Class A conspiracy to commit robbery with proof that the conspirators intended to cause serious bodily injury in committing the robbery.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Robinson v. State, No. 20A04-1209-CR-561, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 23, 2013).

Brief contact twice with the fog line on a curvy road at night did not confer reasonable suspicion for a traffic stop.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Meehan v. State, No. 71A04-1209-CR-453, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 25, 2013).

Presence of defendant’s DNA on an object at the crime scene, standing alone, was insufficient to prove he committed the offense.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion

Lopez v. State, No. 15A01-1212-CR-550, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 8, 2013).

When the State had seized considerable sums from defendant’s safe deposit boxes, the adverse effect flight would have on his ability to recover the money was a factor the court should have given some weight to in setting bail.

Read Case Clip or Read Full Opinion